
The same basis
Compare protein footprints
Land, water and climate impacts should be compared per 100 g of protein—not per kilogram of food. But a common unit alone cannot make different studies directly comparable.
An honest launch chart
No false precision.
There is no single independent dataset that gives directly comparable land, water and climate values for every route below. Rather than combine incompatible estimates into one leaderboard, this static comparison shows the main drivers that each measurement must include. Numerical values will be added only when the source, system boundary and protein basis can be checked together.
A driver is not a result. For background on established food-system assessments, see Our World in Data’s environmental impacts overview and the life-cycle study by Poore and Nemecek (2018). These sources do not provide like-for-like measurements for every emerging protein route.
How to read the chart
Same denominator. Clear boundaries.
- Use edible protein as the functional unit—not total food weight.
- Keep land-use change, feedstock, energy and processing in view.
- Separate measured commercial data from projections and pilot results.
- Treat water with location in mind; withdrawal and consumption differ.
